JENIFFER RUBIN ABOUT THE BIBI SPEECH TO CONGRESS

AN AMAZING RECAP

THE WASHINGTON POST’s JENNIFER RUBIN HAS DONE A GREAT JOB PRESENTING THE CASE BIBI LAYED OUT IN FRONT OF THE JOINT SESSION OF THE CONGRESS OF THE USA AND WOE TO US IF OBAMA AND KERRY LEAD THE FIVE PARTNERS DOEN THE PATH THEY ARE GOING PRESERVING THE NUCLEAR INFRASTRUCTURE IN IRAN WITHOUT DISABLING ITS CAPABILITY TO ENRICH URANIUM WITHOUT RESTRAINING ITS MEGALOMANIAC DRIVE.

AND HERE ARE JENNIFER’S WORDS:

Right Turn – What Benjamin Netanyahu just did

     By Jennifer Rubin March 3 at 1:15 PM  

Netanyahu’s speech to Congress,

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a joint session of Congress that removing economic sanctions on Iran would have terrible outcomes. Here are highlights from his speech. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress was a devastating indictment of the P5+1′s entire approach, and it reminded and reunited Democrats and Republicans, as did Sen. Robert Menendez’s speech to AIPAC Monday, on what is at stake and why the deal under contemplation can never come to pass.

As a preliminary matter, it is evident that had the president not thrown a fit, Netanyahu’s speech might not have garnered quite so much attention. But to be honest, the fuss mostly remained in the media. When the chips were down, it appeared that all but far-left lawmakers and Congressional Black Caucus members attended. That, incidentally, is a problem on the left, which has become virulently anti-Israel, as has the left in Europe and elsewhere (hence the BDS movement’s prominence on left-wing campuses and European capitals).

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu address a joint meeting of Congress on Tuesday. Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) and President pro tempore of the Senate Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) applaud behind Netanyahu. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

The speech was not aimed at the president, who is immune to reason, nor to the negotiators who suffer from a variation of Stockholm Syndrome, whereby they come to identify with their bargaining opponents more than the country they represent. It was aimed at American public opinion and uncertain Democrats on whose good judgment Netanyahu must rely to derail a disastrous deal. By flattering the president and Democrats, Netanyahu gave them an out to agree with him without crossing the president or appearing to give in to Republicans. He said so bluntly it was starting: This is a bad deal. No deal is better. And he explained exactly why.

In laying out his argument in such logical order — explaining the nature of the threat, the two central flaws in the deal (leaving Iran with most of its nuclear infrastructure and lifting restrictions after a decade) and explaining the false choice between this deal and war (instead, hold the line and beef up sanctions) — he made clear that if one understands the nature of the Iranian regime and what the concessions mean, one cannot be in favor of this deal. “Absent a dramatic change, we know for sure that any deal with Iran will include two major concessions to Iran. The first major concession would leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure, providing it with a short break-out time to the bomb. Break-out time is the time it takes to amass enough weapons-grade uranium or plutonium for a nuclear bomb. . . . But the second major concession creates an even greater danger that Iran could get to the bomb by keeping the deal. Because virtually all the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program will automatically expire in about a decade.” The conclusion was nearly inescapable: “It doesn’t block Iran’s path to the bomb; it paves Iran’s path to the bomb.”

Netanyahu addresses both houses of Congress(43:30)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke before a joint session of Congress on March 3, 2015. Here are his full remarks. (Associated Press)

From identical talking points spouted by Obama administration apologists, we know the Obama defense is that there is no alternative. But Netanyahu gave them one, and in doing so pointed Congress in the right direction.”We can insist that restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program not be lifted for as long as Iran continues its aggression in the region and in the world. Before lifting those restrictions, the world should demand that Iran do three things. First, stop its aggression against its neighbors in the Middle East. Second, stop supporting terrorism around the world. And third, stop threatening to annihilate my country, Israel, the one and only Jewish state.” He was greeted with thunderous applause.

And how to get there? “Well, nuclear know-how without nuclear infrastructure doesn’t get you very much. A race car driver without a car can’t drive. A pilot without a plane can’t fly. Without thousands of centrifuges, tons of enriched uranium or heavy water facilities, Iran can’t make nuclear weapons. Iran’s nuclear program can be rolled back well-beyond the current proposal by insisting on a better deal and keeping up the pressure on a very vulnerable regime, especially given the recent collapse in the price of oil. Now, if Iran threatens to walk away from the table — and this often happens in a Persian bazaar — call their bluff. They’ll be back, because they need the deal a lot more than you do. And by maintaining the pressure on Iran and on those who do business with Iran, you have the power to make them need it even more.” In other words, stop chasing a deal, tighten the screws and give the regime a choice between economic collapse and nukes.

He made three other salient points that the administration would rather obscure.

First, even if the deal on the table was inked, it would set off a series of events far worse than having no deal: “So this deal won’t change Iran for the better; it will only change the Middle East for the worse. A deal that’s supposed to prevent nuclear proliferation would instead spark a nuclear arms race in the most dangerous part of the planet. This deal won’t be a farewell to arms. It would be a farewell to arms control.”

Second, he explained that the hope of Iran changing its stripes down the road is entirely illogical. “Why should Iran’s radical regime change for the better when it can enjoy the best of both world’s: aggression abroad, prosperity at home? This is a question that everyone asks in our region. Israel’s neighbors — Iran’s neighbors know that Iran will become even more aggressive and sponsor even more terrorism when its economy is unshackled and it’s been given a clear path to the bomb. . . . If anyone thinks — if anyone thinks this deal kicks the can down the road, think again. When we get down that road, we’ll face a much more dangerous Iran, a Middle East littered with nuclear bombs and a countdown to a potential nuclear nightmare. Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve come here today to tell you we don’t have to bet the security of the world on the hope that Iran will change for the better. We don’t have to gamble with our future and with our children’s future.”

And finally, he went to the heart of the problem with the administration’s premise, namely that reconciliation with Iran can help us defeat the Islamic State. He argued, “Iran and ISIS are competing for the crown of militant Islam. One calls itself the Islamic Republic. The other calls itself the Islamic State. Both want to impose a militant Islamic empire first on the region and then on the entire world. They just disagree among themselves who will be the ruler of that empire. In this deadly game of thrones, there’s no place for America or for Israel, no peace for Christians, Jews or Muslims who don’t share the Islamist medieval creed, no rights for women, no freedom for anyone. So when it comes to Iran and ISIS, the enemy of your enemy is your enemy.”

It was masterful in many ways. But ultimately, Israel won’t be hobbled or restrained if Netanyahu’s message falls on deaf ears. He wrapped up with a reminder, as he pointed to Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel in the gallery: “And I wish I could promise you, Elie, that the lessons of history have been learned. I can only urge the leaders of the world not to repeat the mistakes of the past. Not to sacrifice the future for the present; not to ignore aggression in the hopes of gaining an illusory peace.  But I can guarantee you this, the days when the Jewish people remained passive in the face of genocidal enemies, those days are over. We are no longer scattered among the nations, powerless to defend ourselves. We restored our sovereignty in our ancient home. And the soldiers who defend our home have boundless courage. For the first time in 100 generations, we, the Jewish people, can defend ourselves.”

He hastened to add to tumultuous applause that “But I know that Israel does not stand alone. I know that America stands with Israel. I know that you stand with Israel. You stand with Israel, because you know that the story of Israel is not only the story of the Jewish people but of the human spirit that refuses again and again to succumb to history’s horrors.”

That’s the hope, and he made it that much more likely by debunking nearly every false note, phony argument and wrong assumption guiding the administration. He is betting congressional Democrats and the American people are smarter and wiser than Obama. How could they not be?

ON ISRAEL FROM THE PEN OF AN ITALIAN JOURNALIST WHO DOES NOT HESITATE TO SPEAK OUT!

OpEds

Giulio Meotti
The writer, an Italian journalist with Il Foglio, writes a twice-weekly column for Arutz Sheva. He is the author of the book “A New Shoah”, that researched the personal stories of Israel’s terror victims, published by Encounter. His writing has appeared in publications, such as the Wall Street Journal, Frontpage and Commentary. He has just prblished a book about the Vatican and Israel titled “J’Accuse: the Vatican Against Israel” published by Mantua Books.

Why Israel is the World’s Best Nation

The writer, an Italian journalist with Il Foglio, writes twice weekly!

TIME FOR FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORS TO FORCE IMPLEMENTATION OF CDC GUIDELINES FOR VACCINATIONS!

Revoke the license of any doctor who opposes vaccination
Amateurs and hucksters are not the only people telling parents not to vaccinate their children. Unfortunately some doctors — men and women sworn to the Hippocratic Oath — are purveying junk science. They say that vaccines cause autism, as in the famous case of Andrew Wakefield, whose study drawing the link has been retracted. Or that measles isn’t that bad, so your child can skip the shots, as Jack Wolfson, a cardiologist in Arizona, says, adding that “the facts” show vaccines to be full of “harmful things” like “chemicals.” Or that, according to some parents, vaccines cause “profound mental disorders,” as Sen. Rand Paul, an ophthalmologist, warned before he walked the statement back. Or that vaccines cause “permanent disability or death,” in the words of Bob Sears, a pediatrician in California.
Read full article »
http://link.washingtonpost.com/544d50763b35d04a5290bbad29dg0.6ia4/VNUkUsPofCbrIga9A1378http://link.washingtonpost.com/544d50763b35d04a5290bbad29dg0.6ia4/VNUkUsPofCbrIga9A1378

AS POLITICALLY AN UNWISE MOVE IT IS WHY NETANYAHU MUST ADDRESS THE US CONGRESS AND ONCE AGAIN WARN OF THE INTENTIONS AND DANGERS OF THE NUCLEAR IRAN AND THE JUST AS POISONOUS CONVENTIONAL IRAN UNLEASHED BY THE BUSH CHENEY PRESIDENCY!

FROM THE ARUTZ SHEVA DAILY FEED
MainOp-Eds

Netanyahu, Haunted By Jabotinsky’s Nightmare (that indeed came true AJK)

On addressing Congress: Netanyahu shouldn’t go – but he must.

Published: Monday, January 26, 2015 11:27 PM

By Jack Engelhard
Jack Engelhard’s classic international bestselling novel “Indecent Proposal,…

Over the past few days, jotting notes on paper napkins, I had it figured why Benjamin Netanyahu shouldn’t go.

By the time I got to the computer and then started reading what others were saying, I completely changed my mind.

When even momentarily I find myself on the same side as Haaretz and The New York Times, on anything, I know something’s wrong.

They’re against Benjamin Netanyahu addressing Congress and bypassing the White House on the perils of a nuclear Iran.

Israel’s Prime Minister, they say, ought to terminate the trip that was extended by Speaker of the House John Boehner. Netanyahu says he’s going.

Watch out, they say. There will be hell to pay for antagonizing President Barack Obama. Better to heed Democrat Obama who is willing to give Iran all the time it needs to act sensibly, rather than heed Republican Boehner who, like Netanyahu, favors heavier sanctions to stop Iran’s nuclear program.

Boehner and Obama are at odds on practically everything, and now that Republicans run the show in the House and Senate, it’s each man to his corner.

Practically all the resources belong to the President. He has built his Office as a private business. He has outwitted Congress at every turn.
There will be blood.

So into the middle of this strictly American political feud comes Israel, and for this reason I thought it best for Netanyahu to stay home.

My original thinking made sense, until it didn’t.

I wrote that Netanyahu was walking into a trap. I saw nothing but trouble ahead at a time when the United States needs Israel more than ever.

There are a thousand reasons why he should go, and only one reason why he shouldn’t, namely Obama, and that is the only reason that counts.

For sure, I surmised, Netanyahu will give a stirring speech. He will prove that Iran poses a threat to Israel, the region, the United States, in fact the entire world.

There will be applause. There will be standing ovations. Boehner will be the first to rise to his feet. He knows the American homeland is at risk.

So Netanyahu will win over Congress – but then what?

He must still face Obama and when the going gets tough, Boehner won’t be around. Obama remains Commander in Chief and between Obama and Netanyahu it is personal.

How’s this for a Mafia message that came from somewhere inside the White House? “Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.”

Obama has been aching for a fight and feeling snubbed, this could be his Netanyahu moment.

Practically all the resources belong to the President. He has built his Office as a private business.

He has outwitted Congress at every turn. He has outsmarted both Houses on healthcare and immigration. He releases terrorist prisoners at his whim. Congress has the power of the purse? So does the President. He can shift money (and support) for or against Israel if not from this pocket then from another pocket.

He can start wars. He can stop wars, Congress be damned. He has no equals. He has no competitors. That’s not how it should be. But that’s how it is.

Even the Supreme Court bent to his will on Obamacare.

Yes, the GOP now runs Congress. But we shall see if even that makes a difference.

Obama decides Israel’s fate at the UN, the International Criminal Court and wherever votes are taken to decide Israel’s standing among the nations.

Does Obama know that only Israel – only a strong Israel — stands as a savior against regional and worldwide doom and that it is America’s vital interest to support the Jewish State? Does Obama know what’s going on in the Middle East? Surely he knows that it’s chaos and that through a domino effect entire civilizations are tumbling.

But his animosity against Netanyahu may cloud his judgment.

Does Netanyahu know that Obama has nearly all the power?

Surely he knows – and surely he must go to make his case. Finally, it came to this observer that there is no choice.

Throughout the generations the Jewish people never fared well when they chose silence.

Haunted by Jabotinsky’s nightmare, Netanyahu refuses to be calmed or quieted.

Zeev Jabotinsky was advised to hush up. Don’t make trouble. But he kept speaking against the European catastrophe he saw coming, and it came. This time it’s Iran and Netanyahu is wise to the looming catastrophe from the country that never misses a chance to declare its intentions to destroy Israel…first Israel, then America.

For the sake of Zion, for the safety of the United States, the Prime Minister of Israel must speak, and let the chips fall where they may.

Jack Engelhard writes a regular column for Arutz Sheva. The new thriller from the New York-based novelist, The Bathsheba Deadline, a heroic editor’s singlehanded war on terror and against media bias. Engelhard wrote the int’l bestseller “Indecent Proposal” that was translated into more than 22 languages and turned into a Paramount motion picture starring Robert Redford and Demi Moore. Website: http://www.jackengelhard.com

THE UGLY FACE OF HYPOCRISY WHEN IT COMES TO BEING FAIR WITH ISRAEL AND THE ARAB WORLD!

Friends, are you for real? Do You really want to reward barbaric behavior? What international law or agreement have the Arabs that Israel has negotiated with have they ever respected? And the international community the so called UN Agencies have they ever respected the rights of Israelis and Israel to live in peace since 1947? These people (the Arabs living west of the Jordan) were given nationhood, the lands they claim now were Arab OCCUPIED LANDS FOR TWENTY YEARS (1947-1967).
They wanted all or nothing then (1947), fought Israel continuously with terrorism, with the Arab countries economically and militarily in 1947, 1948, 1949, 1956, 1967, 1968,1969,1970,1971, 1973, countless Intifadas, countless Lebanon wars, Gaza wars. And no matter what public declaration are made now they still want it all but they know that a foothold will get them everything).
So after all these unmentionable events, with a price tag of tens of thousands of Israelis’ lives and who knows the economic costs and of course the losses to the Arabs (the instigators mind you) they have the gull and the hypocritical UN and the naive Niccolo think it is Par for the course to reset the clock 67 years as if nothing happened and not only that let these same murderers stand with the Iranian supplied arsenal at the back door of Israel and accomplish in a day what they failed to do in SEVENTY FIVE YEARS?
Do you all believe that Israelis are suicidal maniacs in the name of humanism and the fulfillment of the Islamic dream of a worldwide Caliphate? Let China and Russia facilitate that!
It is inconceivable that an independent Arab State can exist on the West Bank of the Jordan river. The British created an Arab state as promised on the east bank of the Jordan when they guaranteed a Jewish Homeland on the West Bank. Unfortunately the Antisemites in Whitehall messed the plan when they allowed unlimited Arab migration to the West Bank under the mufti’s pressure and other political moves.

So what is all this noise about these poor arabs who need nationhood they multihoods, multistans, even caliphshtad you would think that they are orphans without a penny their name while billions are flowing to their coffers from the UN, UNRWA, QATAR, The Arab League, ISLAMIC Charities world wide, the world bank, private donors, taxes collected for them by the state of Israel and who knows who else.
But nobody knows where that money went.
But it is known where it did not go.
And it is known that some of it went into building terror tunnels
From GAZA to Israel.

ADDENDUM – Added January 4, 2014 a total quote:
6
Published: Sunday, January 04, 2015 2:31 AM

Eli E. Hertz
Eli E. Hertz is the president of Myths and Facts, an organization devoted to serve the facts of the M.E. CONFLICT

The weight of the evidence of so many scholars, observers, pollsters and monitors make it almost impossible to mitigate, not to mention ignore the enormity of finding a solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict [or better described as Arab-Israeli war].

When one grasps the duration of the conflict and its roots, when one fully faces the depth of animosity towards Israel and the anti-Semitism that permeates the Arab world from the political, religious and intellectual elites down to the grass roots, the sheer magnitude of the challenge for peacemakers becomes painfully apparent.

When one admits the implications of Palestinian society’s behavior – the repetitive pattern of nearly 100 years of rejectionism on the diplomatic front and a penchant for terrorism against civilians, the “readiness” of Arabs for co-existence and the chances of a breakthrough assume their true proportions.

The unwillingness to accept Israel as a legitimate non-Muslim political entity is epitomized by the Palestinians asymmetrical demands for the Right of Return of all Palestinian refugees to the Jewish state coupled with a demand that the ‘West Bank’ and Gaza be cleansed of all Jews.

One cannot artificially narrow the scope of the conflict. One cannot duck the tough issues – whether in the Palestinian camp or the Arab world as a whole. Western leadership that is “Staying above the conflict” out of fear that demanding Arabs to ‘walk the talk’ will jeopardize one’s status as an honest broker has not and will not bring peace.

There has never been “a cycle of violence.” Resorting to such neutral terminology requires the U.S. and Europe to acquiesce to, and perpetuate a gross misrepresentation of reality.

Putting Israel and its neighbors on the same footing totally ignores the asymmetry of the history of the conflict and something as fundamental as “cause and effect.”

The truth is – one side has been the aggressor time-after-time. The Arabs have been the initiators of more than five major wars resulting in the death of more than 22,000 Israeli soldiers and civilians. Arabs continuously call for political and economic boycotts and unbridled incitement. The Palestinian Arabs have launched wave-after-wave of terrorism against Israelis and other Jews and made hate the fuel that directs and runs their society.

All this began before there was a State of Israel, before there was an “occupation” and it continues unabated to this day.

In response to these onslaughts, Israel has not demanded reparations for the horrific causalities it has sustained in its fight for survival against repeated Arab aggression.

It did not ask the Arab countries forrestitution on behalf of 899,000 Jews that fled “All Moslem Lands” [NY Times , May 16, 1948]. It has only asked that it be allowed to live in peace with recognized and defendable borders as suggested in UN Security Council Resolution 242, and to develop according to its own Jewish ethos, and this is hardly an excessive demand.

THE THREE RING CIRCUS CALLED THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL

The vote in the Security Council

Muslim Scholar Favors Jewish Temple Mount Prayer – Middle East – News – Arutz Sheva

The Middle East Media Research Institute

Jordanian Preacher Yassin Al-‘Ajlouni Proposes Place Of Worship For Jews On The Temple Mount: ‘I Call Upon The Islamic World And The Hashemite Sovereign To Allocate For The Peaceful Among The Jewish Israelites A House Of Prayer Within Beit Al-Maqdis’

In a statement posted on the Internet on December 18, 2014, Jordanian preacher Sheikh Yassin Al-‘Ajlouni said that the Jews should be given a place of worship on the Temple Mount. “There should be a special place of worship for the Jews among the Israelites, under Hashemite and Palestinian sovereignty,” he said.

Sheikh Al-‘Ajlouni was born in Jordan and raised in Syria; he later returned to Jordan. He teaches physics, and shares his religious thoughts via a YouTube channel and a Facebook page (ar-ar.facebook.com/neesayioulja) where he is referred to as a historian. He also maintains a blog (alfetnh.blogspot.co.il/) and a Twitter account (@yaseenajlouni). He opposes the Islamic State (ISIS) as well as Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad and the Houthis in Yemen.

Following are excerpts from the statement:

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

Capture1222.JPG

Yassin Al-‘Ajlouni: “I have given a lot of thought into what I am about to say, because I know that it is the most important issue of our times, and that whoever talks about it is likely to face severe criticism, and will be accused of generating controversy and maybe even strife. Do the Israelites have the right to pray in Beit Al-Maqdis? Is it permissible to allocate a place of worship in Beit Al-Maqdis for the Israelites?

“When Omar Ibn Al-Khattab entered Beit Al-Maqdis, he encountered a place of worship dedicated for those Israelites who were Christians. This place, called the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, was built in the days of Emperor Constantine. Omar left this place, in which the Christian Israelites prayed, intact. He did not take it away from them.

“The place where Omar Ibn Al-Khattab prayed was named the Al-Aqsa Mosque, but the truth is that the Al-Aqsa Mosque is not the Mosque of Omar, but the entire area within the old walls, which is called Beit Al-Maqdis. I call upon the Islamic world and upon the Hashemite sovereign to allocate for the peaceful among the Jewish Israelites a house of prayer within Beit Al-Maqdis.

“Beit Al-Maqdis is the place sanctified by Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph, as well as by Jesus son of Mary and by the Muslims. There should be a special place of worship for the Jews among the Israelites under Hashemite and Palestinian sovereignty, and in agreement with the Israeli regime. Guarding the place and the comings and goings will be under Hashemite control and sovereignty. This by no means entails the harming of the Al-Aqsa Mosque or of the Dome of the Rock. Part of the courtyard, where there are trees, will be allocated for the prayer of the Israelites.

“I officially call upon the religious ruling authorities in Palestine and Jordan to issue a fatwa that will clarify their religious position regarding the building of a place of worship dedicated for the Israelite Jews. Allah’s prayers and blessings upon the Prophet Muhammad and his companions

</a

THE GLORY AND DEMISE OF THE JUBAR SYNAGOGUE, IN A SUBURB OF DAMASCUS

ONE OF THE OLDEST SYNAGOGUES KNOWN AS THE HIDING PLACE OF THE PROPHET ELIJAH AND IN EXISTENCE SINCE 720 BCE.

TURKEY DEFACTO SUPPORTS THE IS AND ITS FIGHTERS? IS THIS REALLY AN ALLY AND A FRIEND CAN TURKEY REMAIN A MEMBER OF NATO?

Perhaps it should be a hint to the western power to back out of a coalition against the Islamic State, IS. It seems that all the hoopla about it in the west has served and benefited ISIS OR ISIL OR IS rather than held it back.

So about Turkey’s role:

The following report is a complimentary offering from MEMRI’s Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM). For JTTM subscription information, click here.

Note to media and government: For a full copy of this video, send an email with the title of the report in the subject line to media@memri.org. Please include your name, title, and organization in your email.

An October 27, 2014 report by the Kurdish news agency DIHA claims that Turkey is cooperating with the Islamic State (IS), and presents as evidence footage that it claims was shot by the agency on October 22 which shows IS fighters meeting with Turkish soldiers.

The English-language DIHA report states:

“Turkish support for ISIS gangs has been proved once more with photographic evidence. Armed gang members have been photographed at the border with Turkish soldiers, bidding each other farewell.

“Turkish support for ISIS gangs, which is constantly on the international agenda, has been documented once again by footage shot by the Dicle News Agency (DİHA), which shows armed men talking to soldiers before crossing into Rojava. This close support for ISIS contrasts with the treatment accorded to dozens of civilians from Kobane who have been made to wait for hours at the Murşitpınar border gate by soldiers and have lost their lives as a result.

“Intimate meetings between Turkish soldiers and ISIS!

“Footage shot on the Zorava hill in Kobanê on 22 October 2014 shows five gang members arriving at the border where citizens of Kobane have left their vehicles. The gang members burn the property of the Kobane citizens, before taking away anything useful in the cars and heading towards the village of Siftek, which is under their control. Then 2 gang members come to the border and talk to 7 soldiers who get out of an armoured vehicle. After about half an hour they say farewell to each other and leave the area. While what was said in the conversation is not known, the gangs who said farewell to the soldiers will be preparing to perpetrate fresh massacres.” [1]

AN OPEN LETTER TO SENATOR ROBERT PORTMAN OF OHIO

Senator Portman posted an elaborate concise proposal to overcome EBOLA in the USA, I wish that he would assume more responsibility towards what affects more Americans every day of their lives.

Senator PORTMAN,
You will save AMERICAN LIVES if you had put into action such a concise plan to stop and reverse gun proliferation. Stop FRACKING, fight global warming, enact social and tax reforms laws that will reduce poverty, enact laws guaranteeing minimum living wages countrywide. There is so much you can do that will save so many more lives and improve the quality of life of so many! Yet all you can talk and act about is EBOLA!
You are nothing but a hypocritical forked tongue paid off stooge of big money!